a standardized identifier rather than just a marketing brand name.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy Network Identity Matters<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Telecom brands are messy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Companies merge.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Brands disappear.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Networks are renamed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
One company operates multiple brands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Several companies may share infrastructure.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MVNOs sell service without owning radio networks.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
MVNEs provide infrastructure behind other providers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Enterprise, government and private networks may possess network codes despite having no retail offering at all.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
International networks can operate outside the normal country model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And travel-eSIM companies can sell connectivity globally without owning an MCC\/MNC of their own.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A simple list called \u201cmobile operators by country\u201d<\/strong> can therefore become misleading very quickly.<\/p>\n\n\n\neSIMGlobo takes a more conservative approach.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A network-code assignment is presented as evidence that an entity holds that identifier.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is not automatically treated as evidence that the entity currently operates a consumer mobile service, sells eSIMs or fits a particular commercial category<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThat distinction is central to the whole directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 1: Search Nearly 2,000 Telecom Records<\/h1>\n\n\n\n The main search allows users to explore the current collection of 1,980 records<\/strong> using several kinds of information:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nProvider name<\/li>\n\n\n\n Country<\/li>\n\n\n\n Network code<\/li>\n\n\n\n Provider type<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThat means the directory can be useful from several directions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You may know the company but not the network code.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You may know the MCC\/MNC but not recognize the network.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
You may want to see every recorded assignee in a country.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Or you may be investigating a specific category of network entity.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rather than forcing every search to begin with a familiar consumer brand, eSIMGlobo lets the technical network identity become the starting point.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 2: Browse Telecom Networks by Country<\/h1>\n\n\n\n One of the easiest ways to explore the platform is through the Countries & Scopes<\/strong> directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe current dataset spans 216 countries and international scopes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nEach country page brings its network-code records together and shows the MCCs associated with that market.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Take Japan as an example.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The current Japan directory contains 40 records<\/strong> across MCC 440<\/strong> and 441<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAmong the entities represented are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nKDDI Corporation<\/li>\n\n\n\n NTT DOCOMO<\/li>\n\n\n\n Rakuten Mobile Network<\/li>\n\n\n\n SoftBank<\/li>\n\n\n\n Internet Initiative Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n SORACOM<\/li>\n\n\n\n Fujitsu<\/li>\n\n\n\n Sony Wireless Communications<\/li>\n\n\n\n Nokia Innovations Japan<\/li>\n\n\n\n Several infrastructure, cable and enterprise-network entities<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThis immediately demonstrates why the directory is not merely a list of consumer mobile brands.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A country’s E.212 landscape can include traditional operators alongside infrastructure companies, IoT networks, private-network operators and other assignees.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 3: Explore the World Through MCC Network Codes<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Sometimes you start with a number rather than a company.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo therefore maintains a dedicated Network Codes \/ MCC index<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe current directory exposes 224 Mobile Country Codes<\/strong> represented in its registry.<\/p>\n\n\n\nA user investigating:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
440<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\ncan connect it to Japan.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Someone researching:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
404<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\nor:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
405<\/code><\/p>\n\n\n\ncan reach India.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
262<\/code> maps to Germany.<\/p>\n\n\n\n310<\/code> through several related MCC ranges connect to the United States.<\/p>\n\n\n\nAnd 901<\/code> represents an international shared-code environment rather than one conventional country.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThis can make eSIMGlobo particularly useful for engineers and analysts who encounter MCC\/MNC values in:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nMobile-network logs<\/li>\n\n\n\n SIM or modem diagnostics<\/li>\n\n\n\n IoT devices<\/li>\n\n\n\n Roaming records<\/li>\n\n\n\n Telecom APIs<\/li>\n\n\n\n Connectivity platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n Network configuration<\/li>\n\n\n\n eSIM platforms<\/li>\n\n\n\n Cellular troubleshooting<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nInstead of searching an unexplained number through random tables across the web, the number can lead to a structured provider record.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 4: Dedicated Provider Profiles<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Every network-code assignee in the baseline has its own provider page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A provider profile begins with a concise identity summary and can include:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nOfficial record name<\/li>\n\n\n\n Internal provider record ID<\/li>\n\n\n\n Provider classification<\/li>\n\n\n\n Classification basis<\/li>\n\n\n\n Country or operating scope<\/li>\n\n\n\n Network codes<\/li>\n\n\n\n E.212 assignment count<\/li>\n\n\n\n Consumer-service status<\/li>\n\n\n\n Verification state<\/li>\n\n\n\n Date last verified<\/li>\n\n\n\n MCC<\/li>\n\n\n\n MNC<\/li>\n\n\n\n PLMN<\/li>\n\n\n\n Assignment status<\/li>\n\n\n\n Evidence<\/li>\n\n\n\n Change history<\/li>\n\n\n\n Related records<\/li>\n\n\n\n FAQs<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nConsider the AT&T example.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Rather than relying on the reader’s existing knowledge of AT&T, the baseline page states exactly what the evidence being used proves: an official E.212 assignment under the United States for network code 314-390<\/code>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIt then separately states that the commercial MNO\/MVNO classification has not yet been independently verified within eSIMGlobo’s evidence model.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That may feel almost excessively cautious for a famous operator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But it reveals something important about how the platform is designed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Brand familiarity is not being treated as a substitute for evidence.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nFeature 5: Every Important Claim Can Point Back to Evidence<\/h1>\n\n\n\n A telecom directory becomes far more useful when the reader can ask:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\u201cWhy should I believe this?\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo attaches an Evidence & Sources<\/strong> section to provider profiles.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIts baseline dataset comes from official ITU E.212 assignment records, and the platform reports that every one of its initial 1,980 records carries an official source URL.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For further enrichment, eSIMGlobo publishes a source hierarchy that prioritizes:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nNational telecom regulators and government records<\/li>\n\n\n\n Official provider websites, policies, price sheets, coverage maps and support information<\/li>\n\n\n\n ITU and recognized standards or industry bodies<\/li>\n\n\n\n Provider-supplied material with verifiable ownership<\/li>\n\n\n\n Independent measurement or reputable primary research<\/li>\n\n\n\n Clearly identified user reports<\/li>\n<\/ol>\n\n\n\nThis hierarchy matters.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A price copied by an anonymous comparison site should not carry the same evidentiary weight as a provider’s current official price sheet.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A claimed network role should not become \u201cverified\u201d merely because dozens of websites copied the same unsupported statement.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 6: \u201cUnknown\u201d Is Treated as Real Data<\/h1>\n\n\n\n This might be the most important feature of the entire platform.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Many databases hate empty fields.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If something cannot be found, there is a temptation to turn missing data into:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
No<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThat is dangerous.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is a huge difference between:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\u201cThis provider does not support eSIM.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
and:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\n\u201cWe have not yet verified whether this provider supports eSIM.\u201d<\/p>\n<\/blockquote>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo explicitly preserves that distinction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Its data policy defines states such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nVerified<\/li>\n\n\n\n Official-source supported<\/li>\n\n\n\n Reported but not yet verified<\/li>\n\n\n\n Historical<\/li>\n\n\n\n Disputed<\/li>\n\n\n\n Not publicly disclosed<\/li>\n\n\n\n Not yet researched<\/li>\n\n\n\n Not applicable<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nMissing information is not automatically converted into a negative claim.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That may sound like a small editorial rule.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is actually a major data-quality principle.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Absence of evidence is not automatically evidence of absence.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nFeature 7: Publication Tiers Show How Mature a Record Is<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Not every provider page is equally complete, and eSIMGlobo does not pretend otherwise.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The methodology defines several publication levels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tier 0 \u2014 Registry Baseline<\/h3>\n\n\n\n The record originates from the registry baseline and has not yet received full editorial enrichment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tier 1 \u2014 Identity Verified<\/h3>\n\n\n\n The record adds stronger identity verification, current or historical status, role information or an explicit explanation that the role remains unresolved, together with multiple authoritative references.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tier 2 \u2014 Enriched<\/h3>\n\n\n\n Additional meaningful provider, service, network, contact and policy information is sourced.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Tier 3 \u2014 Gold<\/h3>\n\n\n\n The profile reaches the platform’s higher enrichment standard.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This tiering system gives the directory a way to grow without disguising incomplete profiles as finished research.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 8: A Much Larger Provider Profile Is Planned Beneath the Baseline<\/h1>\n\n\n\n The current registry is only the starting layer.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Provider pages reveal that the full eSIMGlobo profile model spans 46 sections<\/strong> and potentially 1,309 fields<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThe broader schema includes areas such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nProvider identity<\/li>\n\n\n\n Network identity<\/li>\n\n\n\n Evidence and verification<\/li>\n\n\n\n Accounts and apps<\/li>\n\n\n\n Customer support<\/li>\n\n\n\n Business and enterprise services<\/li>\n\n\n\n USSD and service codes<\/li>\n\n\n\n Physical SIM information<\/li>\n\n\n\n eSIM support<\/li>\n\n\n\n Roaming<\/li>\n\n\n\n Plan pricing<\/li>\n\n\n\n Device compatibility<\/li>\n\n\n\n APN and technical settings<\/li>\n\n\n\n Payment and billing<\/li>\n\n\n\n Network technology<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nFor many present-day Tier 0 pages, only a small percentage of those fields are populated.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
And that is shown openly.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Instead of filling the page with generic text, the interface can say:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Not documented.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe site also indicates that operators can claim their profiles and help complete the remaining information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
If that enrichment model develops successfully, eSIMGlobo could move from being primarily a network-code directory toward something closer to a structured knowledge base for global connectivity providers<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nFeature 9: Provider Types Go Beyond MNO and MVNO<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Real telecom ecosystems cannot be represented with just two labels.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The current eSIMGlobo homepage separates its records into categories including:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nNetwork-code assignee \u2014 exact MNO\/MVNO role unresolved<\/li>\n\n\n\n International shared-code assignee<\/li>\n\n\n\n Private, enterprise, government or test network-code assignee<\/li>\n\n\n\n MVNO \u2014 subtype not verified<\/li>\n\n\n\n Mobile Virtual Network Enabler<\/li>\n\n\n\n International trial shared-code assignee<\/li>\n\n\n\n Other-purpose shared-code assignee<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nFor example, the current registry explicitly classifies Cellact Communications Ltd<\/strong> as an MVNO because \u201cMVNO\u201d appears in the underlying official assignee name.<\/p>\n\n\n\nSimilarly, CIRCLES MVNE International B.V.<\/strong> is classified as a Mobile Virtual Network Enabler because the role is explicitly present in the official record name.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThis is a good illustration of eSIMGlobo’s approach:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
classify when the evidence supports classification; otherwise keep the role unresolved.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nFeature 10: International and Shared Networks Are First-Class Records<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Mobile connectivity is no longer exclusively tied to conventional national operators.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Satellite connectivity, global IoT, aviation, maritime networks and internationally shared services increasingly operate across borders.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo includes international shared-code assignments<\/strong> rather than trying to force every provider underneath a country.<\/p>\n\n\n\nIts worldwide\/shared-code page currently contains 80 records associated with MCC 901<\/strong>, including organizations such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\n1NCE<\/li>\n\n\n\n AST SpaceMobile<\/li>\n\n\n\n AT&T<\/li>\n\n\n\n BICS<\/li>\n\n\n\n BBIX Singapore<\/li>\n\n\n\n Bouygues Telecom<\/li>\n\n\n\n Several global connectivity and infrastructure companies<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe official ITU database likewise maintains E.212 shared mobile-code assignments, confirming that these international identifiers are a formal part of the E.212 ecosystem.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
This makes the directory more relevant as connectivity continues moving beyond the traditional:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
country \u2192 carrier \u2192 SIM<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nmodel.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 11: Change History Adds Time to the Data<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Telecom information changes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An assignment today may not have existed five years ago.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A provider may be renamed.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An MNC may be returned or reassigned.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A network’s commercial status may change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Provider pages therefore include change-history information such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nWhen the record was first seen<\/li>\n\n\n\n The date of its last recorded change<\/li>\n\n\n\n The date through which the profile data was checked<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe directory itself also maintains a public changes page.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Its initial baseline, recorded on July 21, 2026<\/strong>, imported 1,980 E.212 network-code assignee records across 216 countries and scopes and created a stable page for each record.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThat is important because data without time context can easily become misleading.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 12: Corrections Require Evidence<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Crowdsourced information can improve a directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It can also destroy one.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo therefore allows readers to report incorrect or missing information but asks them to provide:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nThe relevant record<\/li>\n\n\n\n The corrected information<\/li>\n\n\n\n An official source that can be checked<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe site states that it will not publish personal contact details scraped from third-party sites and only adds correction facts that can be supported by an official source.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That creates a useful balance:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
community input without turning the directory into an unverified wiki.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nFeature 13: Telecom Terminology Is Explained<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Network databases quickly become unreadable for anyone who does not live inside the telecom industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo therefore includes a glossary for terms such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nMNO<\/li>\n\n\n\n MVNO<\/li>\n\n\n\n MVNE<\/li>\n\n\n\n MVNA<\/li>\n\n\n\n MCC<\/li>\n\n\n\n MNC<\/li>\n\n\n\n PLMN<\/li>\n\n\n\n E.212<\/li>\n\n\n\n eSIM<\/li>\n\n\n\n APN<\/li>\n\n\n\n IMSI<\/li>\n\n\n\n VoLTE<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThis makes the platform potentially useful not only to telecom professionals, but also to software engineers, IoT developers, cybersecurity researchers and technically curious travelers who encounter these terms for the first time.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 14: No Advertising Trackers or Unnecessary Cookies<\/h1>\n\n\n\n The site’s privacy model is unusually simple.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
According to its current privacy policy, eSIMGlobo operates as a static website, does not run visitor advertising or tracking, and does not place non-essential cookies\u2014so it does not need a cookie-consent banner for those purposes.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Normal web-server access logs may still contain information such as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nIP address<\/li>\n\n\n\n Timestamp<\/li>\n\n\n\n Requested URL<\/li>\n\n\n\n User agent<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nbut the site says those logs are retained for security and reliability rather than individual profiling.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For a research-oriented directory, the absence of advertising incentives also fits naturally with its independent positioning.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Feature 15: Core Provider Data Works Without JavaScript<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Another thoughtful implementation choice appears in the site’s accessibility policy.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo targets WCAG 2.2 AA<\/strong> and states that it provides:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nSemantic landmarks and headings<\/li>\n\n\n\n Skip navigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n Keyboard-accessible navigation<\/li>\n\n\n\n Visible focus indicators<\/li>\n\n\n\n Text status alongside colors and icons<\/li>\n\n\n\n Responsive tables<\/li>\n\n\n\n Reduced-motion support<\/li>\n\n\n\n Print stylesheets<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nMost importantly for a data directory, its core provider information remains available without JavaScript<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nJavaScript enhances the search experience, but the underlying records remain browseable.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That is a good design choice for a reference site whose primary product is information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Who Can Use eSIMGlobo?<\/h1>\n\n\n\n The platform can potentially serve several very different audiences.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Telecom Engineers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Engineers can look up MCC\/MNC\/PLMN information while investigating network identity, roaming behavior or carrier configuration.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
IoT Engineers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Cellular IoT devices frequently expose network identifiers that need to be mapped back to an operator or assignment.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIM and Connectivity Platforms<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Companies building eSIM, roaming or connectivity products need to understand the relationships between network identifiers, operators and international connectivity providers.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Developers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Applications working with SIM, IMSI, cellular-network or carrier metadata often need reliable normalization of operator information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Cybersecurity and Fraud Analysts<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Network identifiers can provide context when analyzing mobile infrastructure, suspicious connectivity or carrier-related metadata.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Telecom Researchers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Researchers can browse network assignments by geography, code and organization while retaining links to official evidence.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Technology Journalists<\/h2>\n\n\n\n Instead of repeating an unsourced carrier classification, journalists can trace the underlying assignment and distinguish verified facts from unresolved commercial details.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Travelers and Consumers<\/h2>\n\n\n\n For consumers, the value is currently more research-oriented. The directory may help explain the networks behind mobile connectivity, but it should not yet be treated as a complete comparison engine for current retail plans or eSIM products.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
What eSIMGlobo Does NOT Prove<\/h1>\n\n\n\n This section may be the most important one for anyone using the directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An E.212 assignment tells us something specific:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
an entity has been assigned a particular mobile-network identifier.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIt does not<\/strong>, by itself, prove that:<\/p>\n\n\n\n\nThe entity currently offers retail mobile service<\/li>\n\n\n\n It is definitely an MNO<\/li>\n\n\n\n It is definitely an MVNO<\/li>\n\n\n\n It currently sells eSIMs<\/li>\n\n\n\n Its plans are commercially available<\/li>\n\n\n\n The company is still actively marketing that network<\/li>\n\n\n\n Every MVNO operating in that country is represented<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\neSIMGlobo repeatedly highlights this distinction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
There is also an important structural limitation to E.212-based discovery.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Many light MVNOs, service-provider MVNOs, MVNE\/MVNA relationships and travel-eSIM resellers may not hold their own MNC at all<\/strong>. They therefore cannot be discovered exhaustively simply by enumerating E.212 assignments.<\/p>\n\n\n\nThat means:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo should not currently be interpreted as a complete list of every mobile or eSIM company operating commercially in the world.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nThe site itself makes the same distinction.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
An Important Data-Freshness Caveat<\/h1>\n\n\n\n eSIMGlobo is still a young and evolving directory.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The current public change log shows its initial 1,980-record baseline being established in July 2026. Many provider profiles remain Tier 0 registry records with very low profile completeness.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Its Terms of Use also explicitly state that, although the project aims to be accurate and evidence-led, it does not guarantee that every record is current or complete and recommends confirming critical information with the operator or regulator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That is especially important in telecom, where assignments and company structures can change.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
For high-stakes technical, contractual or regulatory decisions, eSIMGlobo is best used as:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
a discovery and evidence-navigation layer\u2014not the final authority replacing a regulator or provider.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhy eSIMGlobo’s Approach Is Interesting<\/h1>\n\n\n\n Most directories compete by trying to contain more information.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo appears to be taking a slightly different position.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
It is trying to make it clear how much confidence you should place in each piece of information<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nConsider these two databases:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Database A<\/h3>\n\n\n\nProvider<\/th> MNO<\/th> eSIM<\/th> 5G<\/th><\/tr><\/thead> Example Telecom<\/td> Yes<\/td> No<\/td> Yes<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\nIt looks complete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But where did those answers come from?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
When were they checked?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Did \u201cNo\u201d actually mean no\u2014or did the database simply fail to find the information?<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Now imagine:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Database B<\/h3>\n\n\n\nFact<\/th> Status<\/th> Evidence<\/th><\/tr><\/thead> Network assignment<\/td> Verified<\/td> ITU<\/td><\/tr> MNO status<\/td> Not yet independently verified<\/td> \u2014<\/td><\/tr> eSIM availability<\/td> Not yet researched<\/td> \u2014<\/td><\/tr> 5G availability<\/td> Official-source supported<\/td> Provider<\/td><\/tr><\/tbody><\/table><\/figure>\n\n\n\nDatabase B looks less complete.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But intellectually, it is far more useful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That appears to be the philosophy behind eSIMGlobo.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Completeness is not allowed to outrank truthfulness.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nFrom a Network-Code Directory to a Global Connectivity Knowledge Base<\/h1>\n\n\n\n The current eSIMGlobo is still primarily a strong registry foundation.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
But the data model suggests a considerably broader ambition.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Imagine a provider record where network identity can eventually connect to verified information about:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Identity \u2192 Network Codes \u2192 Technologies \u2192 SIM \u2192 eSIM \u2192 APN \u2192 Roaming \u2192 Plans \u2192 Pricing \u2192 Devices \u2192 Support \u2192 Business Services \u2192 Billing \u2192 Evidence \u2192 Change History<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIf each important fact maintains its source and verification status, eSIMGlobo could evolve beyond a directory into a structured knowledge graph of the global connectivity industry.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That would be valuable because the telecom ecosystem is becoming more complicated, not less.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
We now have:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
\nTraditional MNOs<\/li>\n\n\n\n Full and light MVNOs<\/li>\n\n\n\n MVNEs and MVNAs<\/li>\n\n\n\n IoT connectivity providers<\/li>\n\n\n\n Global eSIM providers<\/li>\n\n\n\n Private 5G networks<\/li>\n\n\n\n Satellite-to-device networks<\/li>\n\n\n\n International shared-code networks<\/li>\n\n\n\n Enterprise cellular networks<\/li>\n\n\n\n Roaming aggregators<\/li>\n\n\n\n Connectivity-as-a-service platforms<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n\n\n\nThe line between \u201cmobile operator\u201d and \u201cconnectivity provider\u201d is becoming increasingly difficult to describe with one label.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
A directory that preserves those distinctions\u2014and shows its evidence\u2014has room to become genuinely useful.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Final Thoughts<\/h1>\n\n\n\n There are already plenty of websites that can tell you the name of a mobile operator.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That is not the interesting problem anymore.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
The difficult questions are:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Who actually owns the network identifier?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhat does that identifier prove?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhich commercial role is genuinely verified?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhere did that information originate?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nWhen was it last checked?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nAnd what remains unknown?<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\neSIMGlobo is building its directory around those questions.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Its first layer is the global E.212 network-assignment system: currently 1,980 assignee records, 2,486 PLMN assignments and 216 countries or international scopes<\/strong>.<\/p>\n\n\n\nOn top of that foundation, it is establishing an evidence model for gradually adding network technology, eSIM, SIM, roaming, plans, pricing, support, device compatibility, APN, billing and other provider information without silently converting assumptions into facts.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
That is what makes the platform worth watching.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
eSIMGlobo is not trying merely to create a bigger telecom list.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIt is trying to create a telecom directory where a reader can distinguish:<\/p>\n\n\n\n
what is known, what is sourced, what is historical, what is disputed\u2014and what nobody has verified yet.<\/strong><\/p>\n\n\n\nIn a part of the internet filled with copied carrier lists, outdated network codes and unsourced eSIM claims, that may prove considerably more valuable than simply having another database.<\/p>\n\n\n\n
Explore eSIMGlobo \u2014 the evidence-led Signal Atlas for global telecom providers.<\/strong><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"Search for information about a mobile network operator and the internet will give you plenty of answers. The problem is figuring out which answers are actually true…. <\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":1,"featured_media":0,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_joinchat":[],"footnotes":""},"categories":[11138],"tags":[],"class_list":["post-78659","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","hentry","category-best-tools"],"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78659","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/users\/1"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=78659"}],"version-history":[{"count":1,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78659\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":78660,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/posts\/78659\/revisions\/78660"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=78659"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=78659"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.devopsschool.com\/blog\/wp-json\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=78659"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}