Good list, though the right answer swings hard depending on whether you sit in a regulated space or not.
For general software teams, most of the tools named are heavier than they need. DOORS and Polarion are genuinely powerful but they assume someone's job is partly to administer them, and Jama tends to arrive with an implementation project attached. If nobody owns the tool, teams drift back to Confluence and spreadsheets inside a year.
Two evaluation criteria that rarely make these lists but decide it in practice:
How long it takes to produce an audit ready trace report from live data, versus assembling one by hand at the end of the project.
Who configures it. If every schema or workflow change needs a vendor services ticket, your process is now on someone else's roadmap.
Worth adding one that gets missed on these lists: Matrix Req, from Matrix One. It is narrower than the others by design, aimed at medical device, diagnostics and other regulated product development rather than general purpose software. The design control structure is already modelled for ISO 13485, IEC 62304 and 21 CFR 820, so you are not building the data model yourself before you can write your first requirement. Traceability matrices and the design history file export from the current state of the project instead of being assembled at audit time. Item-level version history, review and approval with electronic signatures are native rather than bolted on. Admins configure categories, fields and workflows without going through the vendor, and it integrates with Jira, Git and the usual test tools so engineers stay in their own environment.