Compare the differences between Calico, Flannel, Weave and Cilium

FeatureCalicoFlannelWeaveCilium
Networking modelLayer 3Layer 3 overlayLayer 2 mesheBPF
PerformanceHighGoodGoodHigh
ScalabilityHighHighHighHigh
Security featuresAdvancedBasicBasicAdvanced
Ease of useGoodEasyEasyModerate
MaturityMatureMatureMatureMature

Calico is a networking and network policy provider for Kubernetes. It offers advanced network administration and security capabilities, such as network policy enforcement, service discovery, and load balancing. Calico is a good choice for organizations that need a reliable and secure networking solution for their Kubernetes clusters.

Flannel is a simple, lightweight layer 3 fabric for Kubernetes. It is easy to set up and manage, and supports a variety of backend mechanisms. Flannel is a good choice for organizations that need a basic networking solution for their Kubernetes clusters.

Weave Net is a flexible networking solution for Kubernetes clusters. It is easy to install and configure, and creates a mesh overlay network to connect all the nodes in the cluster. Weave is a good choice for organizations that need a flexible and scalable networking solution for their Kubernetes clusters.

Cilium is a networking, observability, and security solution with an eBPF-based data plane. It offers advanced features such as network policy enforcement, service discovery, and load balancing. Cilium is a good choice for organizations that need a high-performance and secure networking solution for their Kubernetes clusters.

Overall, the best CNI plugin for you will depend on your specific needs and requirements. If you are looking for a simple and easy-to-use solution, Flannel or Weave are good choices. If you need a more advanced solution with security features, Calico or Cilium are good choices.

Here’s a comparison table that highlights some key features and characteristics of the Calico, Flannel, Weave, and Cilium CNI plugins for Kubernetes:

Feature/AspectCalicoFlannelWeaveCilium
Network ModesLayer 3 (BGP) andLayer 2 (VXLAN,Layer 2 (VXLAN,Layer 3 (BPF) and
IPIP overlay, Host-Host-GW) overlay,Host-GW) overlay,Layer 4 (Socket)
GWDirect RoutingDirect Routing
Network PoliciesYes, supports fine-Limited supportYesYes, with advanced
grained networkfor network policiesBPF-based policies
policies
PerformanceHighModerateModerateHigh
ScalabilityHighly scalableGoodGoodHighly scalable
DNS SupportYesLimitedYesYes
ObservabilityYes, with built-inLimitedYes, with built-inYes, with advanced
monitoring and logsmonitoring and logsobservability
MaintenanceRequires someLow maintenance,Low maintenance,Requires some
configurationeasy setupeasy setupconfiguration
Use CasesWide range ofSimple, small-scaleSmall to medium-Security-focused,
use cases, includingdeploymentssized deploymentshigh-performance
security-sensitiveenvironments
workloads
Rajesh Kumar
Follow me
Latest posts by Rajesh Kumar (see all)
Subscribe
Notify of
guest
0 Comments
Inline Feedbacks
View all comments
0
Would love your thoughts, please comment.x
()
x