Others is the catch-all entry in the DevOpsSchool trainer directory — the page for the tool you run that does not have a page of its own. We publish detailed syllabuses for a few hundred technologies, and that still leaves out plenty: an internal platform, a niche vendor product, a language or framework we have not written up yet, a regional compliance tool, or a combination that only makes sense inside your organisation. This page exists so that request has somewhere to land instead of falling through a gap.
What we offer here is not a stock course with the name changed. It is a custom engagement: a discovery call to establish what your team runs and what they need to be able to do afterwards, a syllabus written for that, labs built against your topology, and delivery as a private batch onsite, live online or hybrid. If we do not have credible depth in the technology you name, we will tell you so rather than take the booking — that is the honest boundary on this page, and it is the reason the rest of it is worth reading.
The practical starting point is a short description of your stack: the tool or tools, the versions, what your team can already do, what they need to be able to do, and roughly how many people. From there we can usually say within a day whether we can deliver it well, what shape the course would take, and how long it would need. Use the enquiry form at the bottom of this page and tell us your stack — that is genuinely all we need to begin.
Why this skill matters now
Every organisation runs something that no public course covers. It might be an in-house deployment platform, a vendor product with a small install base, a specialised protocol or standard, or an unusual combination of otherwise ordinary tools. Those are precisely the areas where knowledge is concentrated in two or three people, where onboarding is slowest, and where a departure is most expensive.
Generic training does not solve that. A public course on a nearby technology teaches concepts the team must then translate, and translation is where the value leaks out. What works is a syllabus built around the actual estate, with labs that use the actual topology and examples drawn from the actual failure modes the team has lived through.
There is also a timing argument. Custom training is most valuable at a transition — adopting a new platform, absorbing a team through reorganisation, taking a system back in-house from a vendor, or preparing for an audit. Those moments have a window, and a bespoke two- or three-day engagement inside that window is worth considerably more than a generic course six months later.