Duration: 3 days (instructor-led, hands-on)
Format: 30% guided instruction & demos, 60% labs, 10% exam-style practice
Audience: Developers, DevOps, Security, QA, PMs, Engineering Leads
Assumed level: Participants already know GitLab basics (repos, issues, MRs, pipelines)
1) Introduction
GitLab Duo brings AI assistance into everyday GitLab workflows (coding, reviewing, CI/CD troubleshooting, security understanding, documentation, collaboration). This course makes learners confident and fast with Duo in real delivery work, while also preparing them for the Certified GitLab Duo (AI) Associate exam through daily exam-style practice and a final mock.
2) Course Overview
This is an end-to-end, workflow-based program using one continuous project scenario. Participants learn to apply GitLab Duo to:
- accelerate implementation, refactoring, and understanding of existing code
- improve test quality, coverage, and review readiness
- interpret findings (security/quality) and remediate effectively
- troubleshoot CI failures and optimize pipelines
- improve collaboration artifacts (issues, MRs, docs, handoffs)
- use Duo responsibly: governance, data sensitivity, and quality control
3) Learning Objectives
A) GitLab Duo Advanced Practitioner Outcomes
By the end of Day 3, participants can:
- Configure and govern Duo usage at group/project level (where applicable), and understand who can access what.
- Use Duo effectively in IDE + GitLab UI with strong prompting patterns and “verification-first” habits.
- Apply Duo to advanced coding tasks: generate, refactor, explain, optimize, and document changes.
- Use Duo to strengthen MR quality: better descriptions, reviewer guidance, risk notes, and checklists.
- Use Duo to improve test strategy and create meaningful unit/integration tests (not just “happy path”).
- Use Duo to support security understanding and remediation, and document fixes clearly.
- Use Duo to accelerate CI/CD authoring and perform structured failure analysis from logs.
- Measure outcomes and run Duo adoption safely: quality gates, prompt standards, and ROI signals.
B) Certification Readiness Outcomes
Participants will also be able to:
- Identify exam-style scenario patterns and avoid common pitfalls (over-trusting AI output, skipping verification).
- Explain Duo capabilities, limitations, and responsible usage in clear terms (the kind exams test).
- Perform timed question sets with a repeatable strategy.
4) Participant Profile & Prerequisites
Prerequisites (required)
- Basic GitLab workflow knowledge: repository, branches, merge requests, issues
- Basic CI/CD familiarity: pipelines, jobs, logs
- General understanding of testing and security basics (what they are, not deep expertise)
Recommended (helpful)
- Experience reviewing MRs
- Familiarity with one programming language used in your org
- Comfort reading pipeline logs and stack traces
5) What This Course Is (and Isn’t)
This course is: practical, hands-on, workflow-based, focused on real productivity and exam readiness.
This course isn’t: a Git fundamentals class, or a deep ML/AI theory course.
6) Delivery Approach
- Instructor uses live demos to show “good vs risky” AI usage patterns
- Labs emphasize:
- constraint-based prompting
- verification (tests, lint, pipeline checks)
- MR-ready outputs
- security and compliance awareness
- Daily: exam-style mini quiz + scenario debrief
- End: capstone + mock exam workshop
7) Lab Environment & Materials
Tools needed
- GitLab instance with GitLab Duo enabled (or training environment)
- IDE support: VS Code / JetBrains (preferred) or Web IDE
- A prepared training repository (“AcmePay”) containing:
- at least one legacy module
- incomplete tests
- intentionally flawed pipeline job
- intentionally introduced vulnerability or insecure pattern
- issue + MR templates (basic)
Working agreements (important)
- Treat AI output as a draft: verify before merge
- Do not paste secrets or sensitive data into prompts
- Use the prompt checklist provided in Appendix A
8) Core Use-Case Story (Capstone Scenario)
Scenario: “AcmePay” Microservice Modernization
A payment API repository has:
- a new feature request with partial legacy code
- weak test coverage and missing edge-case tests
- insecure configuration or dependency vulnerability
- flaky CI pipeline and unclear logs
- poor MR descriptions and limited documentation
Across 3 days, participants will use GitLab Duo to:
- implement/refactor safely,
- generate and improve tests,
- understand and remediate security issues,
- troubleshoot CI failures and optimize pipelines,
- produce clean MRs and documentation,
- summarize impact and adoption signals.
9) Day-wise Agenda (3 Days)
Day 1 — Duo Foundations + Advanced Development & MR Excellence
Theme: “Be productive fast, but safely.”
| Time | Session | What participants achieve |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00–09:30 | Orientation + course goals | Understand capstone and how exam prep is embedded |
| 09:30–10:30 | Duo capability map + where it fits | Know “what to use where” across IDE, MR, pipelines, security |
| 10:45–11:45 | Governance + safe usage practices | Access patterns, data sensitivity, responsible AI behavior |
| 11:45–12:30 | Prompting patterns (advanced) | Convert vague asks into reliable, verifiable instructions |
| 13:30–15:00 | Advanced coding workflows with Duo | Generate/refactor/explain with constraints + verification |
| 15:15–16:30 | MR excellence with Duo | Produce MR summaries, risk notes, test plans, review checklists |
| 16:30–17:30 | Exam practice block (Day 1) | 15 timed questions + debrief (why each option is right/wrong) |
Day 1 Labs (hands-on)
- Environment warm-up: Duo access, IDE connection, repo walkthrough
- Feature build with guardrails: implement a new endpoint/module with constraints:
- style rules
- error handling
- logging
- testability requirements
- Legacy code comprehension: ask Duo to explain, then create a refactor plan
- Refactor execution: apply refactor + minimal tests
- MR packaging: generate:
- MR description
- change summary
- risk notes & rollback hint
- reviewer checklist
Day 1 Deliverables
- One MR opened with strong description and checklist
- Refactor plan notes + implemented improvement
Day 2 — Testing & Security: Quality That Scales
Theme: “Make AI raise quality, not just speed.”
| Time | Session | What participants achieve |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00–10:15 | AI-assisted test strategy | Decide what to test, not just generate tests |
| 10:30–12:00 | Test generation + coverage uplift lab | Create meaningful tests (edge cases + negative tests) |
| 13:00–14:15 | Secure coding with Duo | Use AI to explain risks and propose safer patterns |
| 14:15–15:15 | Remediation workflow | Implement fixes + document security decisions clearly |
| 15:30–16:15 | MR review simulation | Use Duo to help structure review comments and verify changes |
| 16:15–17:30 | Exam practice block (Day 2) | 15 timed questions + weak-area drills |
Day 2 Labs (hands-on)
- Test suite build-out for feature and refactor:
- unit tests with edge cases
- failure-path tests
- simple integration tests if applicable
- Quality uplift:
- identify gaps
- improve assertions
- remove flaky patterns
- Security investigation:
- use Duo to explain a vulnerability or insecure code pattern
- propose remediation options with tradeoffs
- Remediation + verification:
- implement fix
- pipeline run
- produce security-focused MR notes
Day 2 Deliverables
- Increased test coverage and improved test quality
- Security fix documented in MR notes (what, why, how verified)
Day 3 — CI/CD Troubleshooting + Collaboration + Full Certification Prep
Theme: “Operate Duo at team scale; finish exam-ready.”
| Time | Session | What participants achieve |
|---|---|---|
| 09:00–10:15 | AI-assisted CI/CD authoring | Generate/optimize pipeline changes safely |
| 10:30–12:00 | Failure analysis & root cause workflows | Use Duo to form hypotheses + verification steps from logs |
| 13:00–14:00 | Duo for collaboration & documentation | Create issue updates, release notes, and handoffs |
| 14:00–14:45 | Measuring impact + adoption standards | Define KPIs and guardrails; create team prompt standards |
| 15:00–16:15 | Capstone execution | End-to-end: build → test → secure → ship with Duo |
| 16:15–17:30 | Mock exam + review workshop | Timed mini-mock + remediation plan for each learner |
Day 3 Labs (hands-on)
- Pipeline improvement:
- improve job clarity and failure output
- reduce flakiness
- add missing verification step(s)
- CI failure root cause:
- interpret failing logs
- ask Duo for likely causes + confidence
- validate with targeted checks
- Documentation & comms:
- release note draft
- issue update summary
- QA handoff checklist
- Impact plan:
- define 3 KPIs (speed + quality + risk)
- create “AI usage guardrails” checklist for your team
Day 3 Deliverables
- Pipeline MR + documented reasoning
- Capstone MR with complete evidence (tests, pipeline, notes)
- Personal certification action plan (what to review next)
10) Use Case Library (examples included in exercises)
Development & Refactoring
- Convert a vague feature request into a clean implementation plan + code
- Explain legacy logic and propose refactor steps that minimize risk
- Generate code with constraints (style, performance, security, testability)
Merge Requests & Review
- Produce high-quality MR descriptions and summaries
- Generate reviewer checklists and test plans
- Write constructive review comments; identify risky changes
Testing
- Generate meaningful tests from requirements + edge cases
- Improve assertions and reliability; avoid brittle tests
- Create a test matrix for critical flows
Security
- Explain vulnerability cause, impact, exploit scenario
- Suggest remediation options with pros/cons
- Document security decisions and verification evidence
CI/CD
- Generate or refine
.gitlab-ci.ymlchanges responsibly - Troubleshoot failing jobs using structured hypothesis prompts
- Improve pipeline observability (logs, artifacts, clarity)
Collaboration & Enablement
- Draft release notes and stakeholder updates
- Create reusable prompt templates for team consistency
- Define metrics and safe adoption practices
11) Assessment & Completion Criteria
Daily checks
- End of each day: 15 exam-style questions (timed) + review
Capstone rubric (pass/fail)
Participants pass if they demonstrate:
- Correct use of Duo with clear prompts + constraints
- Verification evidence (tests and/or pipeline results)
- MR quality: summary, rationale, risks, test plan, rollback hint
- Security handling: explain issue + implement fix or mitigation + document
- Operational clarity: pipeline change justified and validated
- Impact summary: what improved and how you know
I’m a DevOps/SRE/DevSecOps/Cloud Expert passionate about sharing knowledge and experiences. I have worked at Cotocus. I share tech blog at DevOps School, travel stories at Holiday Landmark, stock market tips at Stocks Mantra, health and fitness guidance at My Medic Plus, product reviews at TrueReviewNow , and SEO strategies at Wizbrand.
Do you want to learn Quantum Computing?
Please find my social handles as below;
Rajesh Kumar Personal Website
Rajesh Kumar at YOUTUBE
Rajesh Kumar at INSTAGRAM
Rajesh Kumar at X
Rajesh Kumar at FACEBOOK
Rajesh Kumar at LINKEDIN
Rajesh Kumar at WIZBRAND
Find Trusted Cardiac Hospitals
Compare heart hospitals by city and services — all in one place.
Explore Hospitals