Introduction

Multi-party Computation (MPC) toolkits enable multiple parties to jointly compute results over their private data without revealing that data to one another. In a world where data collaboration is essential but privacy regulations are tightening, MPC has emerged as a foundational privacy-preserving technology alongside homomorphic encryption and secure enclaves.

MPC is important because it allows organizations to unlock insights from sensitive data—financial records, healthcare data, user behavior, or cryptographic keys—without creating a single point of exposure. This capability is increasingly critical in regulated industries, cross-company analytics, decentralized finance, and secure AI training.

Real-world use cases include:

• Secure key management in crypto custody
• Privacy-preserving data analytics across organizations
• Confidential machine learning training and inference
• Fraud detection without sharing raw customer data
• Joint risk modeling in finance and insurance

When choosing an MPC toolkit, users should evaluate cryptographic robustness, performance, ease of integration, supported protocols, scalability, and security guarantees. The maturity of documentation, community adoption, and enterprise readiness are equally important.

Best for:
Cryptography engineers, blockchain developers, security teams, fintech firms, healthcare analytics teams, AI researchers, and enterprises handling highly sensitive data.

Not ideal for:
Teams without cryptographic expertise, low-risk applications where traditional encryption is sufficient, or use cases requiring real-time latency at massive scale without optimization.

---

Top 10 Multi-party Computation (MPC) Toolkits Tools

---

1 — MP-SPDZ

Short description:
A research-grade MPC framework supporting a wide range of secure computation protocols, widely used in academia and advanced industry research.

Key features

• Supports arithmetic and boolean MPC
• Multiple protocols (SPDZ, MASCOT, semi-honest, malicious)
• High performance for complex computations
• Python-like high-level language
• Flexible backend compilation
• Active and passive security models

Pros

• Extremely powerful and flexible
• Strong academic validation

Cons

• Steep learning curve
• Limited enterprise tooling

Security & compliance: Cryptographically strong MPC; compliance varies by deployment
Support & community: Strong academic community, limited commercial support

---

2 — SCALE-MAMBA

Short description:
An MPC framework focused on malicious security and scalable performance, often used for high-assurance secure computations.

Key features

• Actively secure MPC protocols
• Optimized preprocessing
• Strong adversarial resistance
• Designed for large computations
• Flexible deployment models

Pros

• High security guarantees
• Efficient at scale

Cons

• Complex setup
• Less beginner-friendly

Security & compliance: Strong cryptographic guarantees; compliance varies
Support & community: Research-oriented documentation and community

---

3 — EMP Toolkit

Short description:
A collection of MPC libraries optimized for two-party and multi-party computation, emphasizing performance.

Key features

• Multiple MPC primitives
• Highly optimized C++ implementation
• Support for boolean and arithmetic circuits
• Benchmark-friendly design
• Modular components

Pros

• Excellent performance
• Well-structured libraries

Cons

• Low-level development required
• Smaller enterprise ecosystem

Security & compliance: Protocol-level security; compliance depends on usage
Support & community: Active academic contributors

---

4 — ABY

Short description:
A specialized MPC framework optimized for two-party secure computation with mixed protocols.

Key features

• Arithmetic, boolean, and Yao sharing
• Efficient protocol switching
• Optimized for low latency
• Open research-driven design
• Strong benchmarking results

Pros

• Very efficient for 2PC
• Well-studied cryptography

Cons

• Limited to two parties
• Not enterprise-ready out of the box

Security & compliance: Cryptographic security; compliance varies
Support & community: Academic support and documentation

---

5 — FATE

Short description:
A federated learning platform with MPC components, designed for privacy-preserving machine learning.

Key features

• MPC-based secure aggregation
• Federated learning workflows
• Large-scale ML support
• Modular architecture
• Strong industry adoption

Pros

• Ideal for privacy-preserving ML
• Production-oriented

Cons

• Heavy infrastructure
• Less general-purpose MPC

Security & compliance: GDPR-aligned design; enterprise controls vary
Support & community: Active open-source and enterprise adoption

---

6 — PySyft

Short description:
A Python-centric framework enabling MPC and federated learning for data science teams.

Key features

• Python-friendly APIs
• MPC and federated learning
• Secure data sharing abstractions
• Integration with ML workflows
• Rapid prototyping support

Pros

• Easy for data scientists
• Strong educational resources

Cons

• Performance overhead
• Still evolving maturity

Security & compliance: Privacy-focused design; compliance varies
Support & community: Active community and learning materials

---

7 — TF Encrypted

Short description:
An MPC-based extension to TensorFlow enabling secure machine learning computation.

Key features

• MPC-backed TensorFlow graphs
• Secure inference and training
• Familiar ML development model
• Research-grade cryptography
• Protocol abstraction layer

Pros

• Natural fit for ML teams
• Strong conceptual model

Cons

• Performance trade-offs
• Limited long-term maintenance

Security & compliance: Cryptographic security; compliance varies
Support & community: Research-driven, limited enterprise support

---

8 — Jiff

Short description:
A JavaScript-based MPC library focused on web and educational use cases.

Key features

• Browser-compatible MPC
• Easy setup for demos
• Flexible protocol options
• Client-server MPC models
• Teaching-friendly design

Pros

• Accessible and simple
• Great for prototyping

Cons

• Not enterprise-grade
• Performance limitations

Security & compliance: MPC security; compliance N/A
Support & community: Small but active academic community

---

9 — SPDZ

Short description:
A foundational MPC protocol family that underpins many modern MPC frameworks.

Key features

• Malicious security
• Offline/online computation split
• Proven cryptographic foundations
• Flexible arithmetic computation
• Widely cited protocol

Pros

• Strong theoretical guarantees
• Highly extensible

Cons

• Not a turnkey toolkit
• Requires deep cryptographic expertise

Security & compliance: Strong cryptographic security; compliance varies
Support & community: Academic research community

---

10 — Sharemind

Short description:
A commercial MPC platform designed for secure data analytics across organizations.

Key features

• Production-ready MPC engine
• Secure data collaboration
• Performance-optimized architecture
• Enterprise deployment models
• Audit-friendly workflows

Pros

• Enterprise-ready
• Strong real-world adoption

Cons

• Commercial licensing
• Less open customization

Security & compliance: Enterprise-grade security; compliance varies by deployment
Support & community: Professional enterprise support

---

Comparison Table

Tool Name	Best For	Platform(s) Supported	Standout Feature	Rating
MP-SPDZ	Advanced MPC research	Linux	Multi-protocol support	N/A
SCALE-MAMBA	High-assurance MPC	Linux	Malicious security	N/A
EMP Toolkit	Performance-critical MPC	C++	Speed optimization	N/A
ABY	Two-party computation	C++	Mixed protocol switching	N/A
FATE	Privacy-preserving ML	Distributed	Federated MPC	N/A
PySyft	Data science teams	Python	Ease of use	N/A
TF Encrypted	Secure ML	TensorFlow	ML-native MPC	N/A
Jiff	Web-based MPC	JavaScript	Browser MPC	N/A
SPDZ	Cryptography research	Protocol-level	Strong theory	N/A
Sharemind	Enterprise analytics	Multi-platform	Production readiness	N/A

---

Evaluation & Scoring of Multi-party Computation (MPC) Toolkits

Tool	Core Features (25%)	Ease of Use (15%)	Integrations (15%)	Security (10%)	Performance (10%)	Support (10%)	Price / Value (15%)	Total
MP-SPDZ	23	8	10	9	9	7	12	78
SCALE-MAMBA	22	7	9	10	9	7	11	75
EMP Toolkit	21	9	9	9	10	7	12	77
ABY	18	10	8	8	9	7	13	73
FATE	20	12	13	8	8	9	12	82
PySyft	18	14	12	7	7	9	13	80
TF Encrypted	17	11	11	8	7	7	12	73
Jiff	14	13	8	6	6	6	14	67
SPDZ	19	6	7	10	8	6	11	67
Sharemind	22	13	14	9	9	10	10	87

---

Which Multi-party Computation (MPC) Toolkits Tool Is Right for You?

• Solo developers & researchers: MP-SPDZ, EMP Toolkit
• SMBs & ML teams: PySyft, FATE
• Mid-market analytics: FATE, Sharemind
• Enterprises & regulated industries: Sharemind

Budget-conscious: Open-source toolkits with in-house expertise
Premium solutions: Commercial platforms with enterprise support
Feature depth vs ease: Research frameworks offer depth; ML-focused tools offer usability
Security needs: Malicious-secure protocols for high-risk environments

---

Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs)

1. What problem does MPC solve?
It allows joint computation on private data without revealing the data itself.

2. Is MPC production-ready?
Yes, but mainly for specialized, high-value use cases.

3. Is MPC slower than traditional computation?
Generally yes, but optimization can reduce overhead significantly.

4. Do I need cryptography expertise?
Most toolkits require moderate to advanced cryptographic knowledge.

5. Is MPC compliant with GDPR?
It supports privacy principles but compliance depends on implementation.

6. Can MPC replace encryption?
No, it complements encryption for collaborative computation.

7. Is MPC suitable for AI training?
Yes, especially in federated and privacy-sensitive ML.

8. How many parties can MPC support?
From two parties to dozens, depending on protocol.

9. What are common mistakes?
Ignoring performance trade-offs and underestimating complexity.

10. Are there alternatives to MPC?
Yes—homomorphic encryption, secure enclaves, and data anonymization.

---

Conclusion

Multi-party Computation toolkits play a critical role in enabling privacy-preserving collaboration across organizations and systems. While the technology is powerful, it is also complex, making careful tool selection essential.

The right MPC toolkit depends on use case complexity, security requirements, performance expectations, and team expertise. There is no universal winner—only the best fit for your specific goals.